Day of Action has stretched to week of action with backing of Occupy
Once a fitting title for a day-long demonstration, this year’s Day of Action for Education in California has expanded into a week-long affair. This is a result of networking, promoting and organizing efforts intended to ensure that it will achieve different results.
The rally will start at 11 a.m. March 1 in Malcom X Plaza and stop at the Civic Center, the California State Building and then City Hall, ending around 6 p.m. This is only the beginning.
A week-long series of rallies and protests will include a 99-mile walk to the state Capitol from Oakland, and a three-day stay inside or on the lawn of the Capitol building in Sacramento.
Some participants attribute these additional events and the increase in collaborations to the support of the Occupy movement.
“There’s much more cohesion in the city and Bay Area in general,” said Federico Villalobos, a member of Occupy SFSU and an art history major at SF State. “The tactics and the momentum are different, so the event is going to be different, because of the ideas of the people behind the event, like Occupy.”
Lalo Gonzalez, a criminal justice major and member of Occupy SFSU, agrees that the attention that has been built up around Occupy in the last few months will aid in the success of the Day of Action.
“Nothing (in the past) is as big as what’s going to happen this year,” said Gonzalez. “Especially with the involvement of Occupy.”
SF State is one of almost 50 organizations that will actively be participating in the National Day of Action for Education Thursday.
The day is intended to provide an opportunity for unions, associations and organizations to speak out against budget cuts and tuition hikes.
“This is going to be more action oriented. I think students are sick of hearing about lobbying their local rep,” said Terence Yancey, a philosophy major at SF State and member of the visual communications work group for Occupy SFSU. “It’s frustrating; for years we’ve been protesting budget cuts. This year it’s going to be different.”
Yancey thinks the three-night stay will further the group’s agenda and help to prove their point.
“Most years we got there and left,” he said. “This year we’re staying.”
Gonzalez also plans to do the 99-mile walk to Sacramento and stay overnight.
But not everyone who supports the philosophy behind the movement is as moved to participate. Ernesto Martinez, an SF State Spanish major, has been disheartened by the way past days of action have gone. He attended in 2010 and 2011, and has been involved in activism for more than six years. However, he will not be participating in any of the Day of Action events this year.
“I think the fact that the Day of Action is an established thing, like a yearly ritual, has changed the face of what it once was or could have been. Now it is like going to church on a Sunday,” he said in an email. “People can excuse themselves from doing any real organizing as long as they attend the events of that day and then go back to normal the next day.”
Gonzalez has a different perspective. He feels that this year’s Day of Action will be more effective because the group knows what they are asking for.
“Before, it was about spreading awareness,” he said. “Now we have solutions.”
Solutions include the Millionaire’s Tax, which would enact a raise in state income tax for millionaires. It could create an estimated $6 to 9.5 billion to fund education and public services, according to the ballot initiative’s website.
Despite Occupy SFSU’s proposed solutions, some students still don’t think walking out is the answer.
“I think walkouts are not that effective,” said Megan Hendry, an SF State art major, who has attended other rallies. “I think protests are a good idea, but missing class is not a powerful message.”
According to Villalobos, people need to take direct action for the event to be truly effective.
“We’re not only about showing our anger and frustration with the government. It’s really about getting out there and showing that physically,” he said. “These events are going to show the public and the people why education needs funding.”